Sahara says that report of Due amount
of Rs 40,000 Cr is incorrect, since such amount or such observation was never
made during the course of hearing either by the Counsel appearing for SEBI or
by the Hon’ble Court or any other Counsel. The figure of Rs. 40000 Cr. is
imaginary and same amounts to irresponsible reporting of Court proceedings.
There is no pleading or any document in the Court record which mentioned the
figure of Rs. 40000 Cr. The order dictated in the open Court on 13.03.2015 also
does not bear this figure and therefore, these amounts to incorrect reporting
of Court proceedings which further dented the image of Mr. Roy and two
directors in the public eye.
2. In fact, the Court
very fairly stated that amount payable was subject to verification and after
verification all excess amount would be refunded Back to Sahara.
3. There is no
observation pertaining to the reporting of one month to save group by the
Hon’ble Court, same is misconceived.
As a matter of
fact, the Hon’ble Court observed during the proceeding to Mr. Kapil Sibal,
Senior Advocate that the outhouse facility along with secretarial staff etc.
can be extended even up to “two months” provided a concrete
proposal is put forward as far as the satisfaction of the bail bond of rest of
the amount of about 6000 Cr. is concerned. Please note that Sahara's
two companies are asked to provide proposal for complying with the remaining
amount out of bail amount of Rs. 5,000 Cr cash (out of which Rs. 4,000 Cr. cash
has already been paid to SEBI) and Rs. 5,000 Cr. as
bank guarantee and not for any imagery figure of Rs. 40,000
Cr. The period of 2 month was observed by the Hon’ble Court when
Mr. Sibal requested for 8 weeks outhouse facility to finalize the transaction
to satisfy the bail bond amount of Rs. 10,000 Cr. as ordered by the Hon’ble
Court on 26.03.2014.
Therefore, the
figure of 4 weeks as reported in the article is incorrect since Mr. Sibal
sought 8 weeks’ time and not 4 weeks. Same is clarified to that extent.
4. The news
represented that an ultimatum was given whereas the order passed by the Hon’ble
Court makes it clear that the Hon’ble Court accepted the request of not
appointing a Receiver since Mr. Sibal stated that a serious attempt has been
made for finalizing a deal of which the documents will be provided to the
Amicus Curiae and the Counsel for SEBI. This acceptance of the request was also
noted in the order dated 13.03.2015. As a matter of fact, Mr. Sibal stated that
the situation of appointment of a Receiver may not arise if an opportunity is
given. There is nothing mentioned in the order passed on 13.03.2015 about any
ultimatum and therefore same amounts to incorrect reporting and same is
clarified to that extent.
5. The Hon’ble Court
extended the facility of communication up to 5 hours a day to Mr. Roy and two
directors of Sahara’s two companies, inside the jail premises which was not
reported in the article. Further, jail authorities were also directed to
facilitate Mr. Roy and two directors with two laptops for functioning which was
also not reported in the article.
6. During the hearing,
SEBI was directed to file an affidavit clarifying its stand when a letter was
indicated to the Hon’ble Court by Mr. Sibal that a communication was issued to
HDFC Bank by SEBI on 19.12.2013 that the order dated 21.11.2013 only applies to
specific movable and immovable properties in a particular application,
therefore, RBI has no cause of action to state that there was a violation by
Sahara India Financial Corporation Limited of the order passed by the Hon’ble
Supreme Court on 21.11.2013 and 04.06.2014.
7. Further, Mr. Sibal
fairly stated during hearing that about Rs. 12,000 Cr. stands deposited with
SEBI as on date out of which barely anything was disbursed by SEBI. The Hon’ble
Court also made it clear that it will be open to argue on that issue at a later
stage. However, the article in the front page of the newspaper reported that
only Rs. 5,120 Cr. was deposited whereas nearly Rs. 12,000 Cr. stands deposited
with SEBI as on date. Same is clarified to that extent.
No comments:
Post a Comment