In many cases, the arrangements being made by the judiciary and after reading comments on the Indian people wonder why most of the time we show the activation of the judges why constrained to. Then Whether it was the 2G scam are mining scam or the coal mines in the allocation of the storm - the scandals, all these cases, monitoring the work of the Supreme Court in an important and active role discharge, and that you know amenities. Its biggest advantage was that civil society has realized that corruption can be controlled or can be prevented. In recent times some of the top court orders or moves naturally expressed satisfaction with the country's many reviewers are shocked.
The Supreme Court in a case of fraud chairman of Samsung Electronics recently ordered to appear before a Ghaziabad court. The reason no one can ask the court to summon the chairman of Samsung was necessary? Although Samsung has officially expressed confidence that the Indian court considers their innocence and finally justice will be done with them. Probably we have a very large company, Global Chairman're pulling too much into a single case. In the case before the court in India of any unnecessary muscle is not that great.
Being true fan of cricket betting scandal in IPL, BCCI about getting my eye on developments. N is the most important thing is that in this case. Srinivasan dogma to be followed over the investigation. Given the betting controversy, the Supreme Court said Srinivasan not only to quit, but Sunil Gavaskar took over for the 7th IPL also ordered. In this context it is important that anyone who raised their voices in favor of Srinivasan. BCCI Here we look at this as a state under the provisions of the Constitution or a major deletion, consider what the organization would be justifiable? Can anyone suggest the name of the court chief? In fact, it is not the job of elected representatives choose their chief? After all, why Gavaskar's name was suggested? Would not it reasonable that the court investigation against Srinivasan and get a clean chit to the work of the appointment of an interim administrator leaves to the discretion of the Board?
I am not a fan of Srinivasan same way about Subrata Roy Sahara India chief can not give too much information. बैंक सुविधा से महरूम इस वर्ग के पास सहारा के एजेंटों ने वक्त-बेवक्त पहुंचकर उनसे उनकी बचत जमा की और गाहे-बगाहे कभी शादी, बच्चों की शिक्षा, अपने लघु व्यवसायों के विस्तार तो कभी पक्के घरों के निर्माण आदि कायरें के लिए उन्हें धन मुहैया made. This task could not be completed KYC Stren some reasons why, in spite of the Sahara has better performance than other financial institutions. Disorders that may be left, but could be improved through the system. You can not close the resort. Subrata Roy, sent to jail by the Supreme Court for bail and asked to deposit Rs ten thousand crores. Their lawyers are still argue that it is unfair. Lawyers are also saying that the judges concerned should withdraw from the case because they do not expect fairness from them. It's certainly not the best position to judge the fairness of judges and lawyers do not trust. Justice VR Krishna Iyer makes me miss the buzz word - not Bell prison.
Courts under judicial activism, no doubt, have the right to interpret or apply the law, but they have no right to make laws or changing them. Similarly, during the days have passed when the hearing was postponed judges laughed unusual observations. Alert the media takes them to wrest away the sensational headlines. A few comments would not have a direct connection with the case. For example, a judge says - Please do not test my patience. There is no mention of such comments in the final results, but the next day the headlines.
In the absence of proper governance or policy or widespread frustration over inaction on the part of the courts hope-filled eyes everyone sees that they will defend democracy. But we all need to ensure that justice is not only to be self-communion, but he would also have seen the stock.
[Author Sudip Bandyopadhyay, president of Destimni Security]
