As a prolonged Sebi-Sahara
battle continues, the regulator has revised lower the expenditure it
intends to recover from the
business group to Rs 25.88 crore in the current fiscal towards money spent on
identifying the investors and making refunds.
As per the court
orders, Saharas were asked to bear the costs incurred by Sebi in identifying
the investors and repayment of refunds to them, which has been an uphill task for
the capital markets watchdog.
In
its mid-term review of budget estimates for the current financial year 2014-15,
Sebi is believed to have pegged the revised estimate of 'expenses recoverable
from Sahara' at Rs 25.88 crore, down from the original budget estimate of Rs
37.66 crore. The actual expenditure already made till December 31, 2014, in
this financial year stood at Rs 8.75 crore.
This
downward revision has taken place largely due to a planned expenditure being
revised from Rs 12 crore to Rs 4 crore for the current fiscal because of
non-operationalisation of a contract given to UTI-ITSL in the Sahara case.
Besides, the advertisement charges have been revised lower from Rs 3 crore to Rs
1.46 crore.
The
amount earmarked for in-person verification charges has also been reduced, as
the same could not be spent amid subsequent developments in the courts and
henceforth a total amount of Rs 1 crore has been set aside for this particular purpose.
In
this high-profile case involving refund of over Rs 24,000 crore and additional
interest of 15 per cent per annum, the Supreme Court had asked Sahara in August
2012 to submit all documents and refund money to SEBI for further repayments to
genuine investors after verifying the documents.
Sahara had submitted 5.28 crore documents to Sebi, which set up a Special
Enforcement Cell for the case. Sebi had awarded a contract to Stock Holding
Corporation of India Ltd (SHCIL) for storage, digitisation, scanning etc, and
to UTI Infrastructure & Technology Services Ltd (UTI-ITSL) for refund related
activities. These two contracts were originally worth
about Rs 55 crore.
In
addition to these contracts, SEBI has incurred significant expenses under other
heads also with regard to the Sahara case, including towards legal costs and
the in-house refund handling expenses.
No comments:
Post a Comment